Before The Men Who Stare Goats, the was THEM. Jon Ronson has a knack for finding the quirky parts of the underground minds in our society. In the THEM, Ronson spends time with the kind of people who believe that there is a secret Jewish conspiracy to take over the world to form the New World Order. The groups differ greatly from the KKK to Islamists to just plain old folks. The conclusion of the book brings Ronson to a bizarre ceremony in northern California that may sound too weird to be true.
By far this has been one of the most fascinating books I have read in a long time. Not every chapter was riveting, but for the most part it had no trouble holding my attention. Learning how some of the nuttier factions of society. Chapter two was the highlight of the book. I'd heard reference to Ruby Ridge before, but honestly knew little besides the name. Ronson spends time with Rachel, the daughter of Randy Weaver, and gets her impression of the events that took place. He later meets up with Randy Weaver himself. In short you learn about a family that moved to the mountains of Idaho to escape the corruption of the world with the strange belief in the coming New World Order and that the government was out to get them. In the end, they paranoia played out in some of the ways they may have expected, but not for the reasons they would have supposed. The events left Randy's wife Vicky and son Sam dead and became a rallying cry and pilgrimage spot for the likes of Timothy McVeigh. Since the events at Ruby Ridge, Randy Weaver has dropped his conspiracy view of the world, many believe it's because his wife was the driving force between those believes.
Ruby Ridge happened prior to the events at Waco, so for many Americans, it's less well known. It's true that the Weaver family and the Davidian Cult held many beliefs. In fact Ronson meets with Randy Weaver at the Davidian site, where it was being rebuilt. Weaver was like a Rock Star to the volunteers working at the site, even though he no longer held those extreme beliefs. What I found most fascinating was what actually lead up to the siege. Randy had been spending time with the local Aryan Nation group and he'd been approached by a federal marshall to spy of the group. He was chosen, because he was not committed to their cause. He spent time with them for the social aspect. He declined the offer. Unfortunately, before the request the same marshall had asked Randy to saw off a couple of shotguns, just below the legal limit. This allowed the government to push Randy's hand. He still refused, despite the threat of prosecution. He never showed up in court, and that's when the nightmare began.
Ronson also spends time with a KKK outfit called the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. This happens to be one Klan faction that was trying to build a more positive image. Less with hating blacks more loving the whites. The difference is subtle, but one factor with this group was the fact that they were making an effort to avoid the N-word, at least in public. The group was using personality tests up the wazzoo to help them to improve themselves and make a better impression publicly. Their buddies at another faction called the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan view this effort as the Klan as going soft, but the AK of the KKK are the ones that make the Jerry Springer appearances. As far as I'm concerned, they are essentially the same. Fascinating, but the same.
The concluding chapter of the book offers a view of the powerful, few are aware of. There's a place in northern California known as the Bohemain Grove where many leaders, government and business, go to talk about issues in the world. It's where George Bush Sr. learned that Cheney would be the running mate of his son in the coming 2000 election. It was merely reported that Bush learned the news while camping in northern California. That would be camping at the Bohemian Grove. Among conspiracy theorists, this is a satanic ritual and evidence of the New World Order. Ronson was able to sneak in attend. He did so with some help. A local lawyer took him in, so to speak.
Ronson learned about this event and decided to check it out, so he contacted one of the extremists he'd spoken to earlier in the book and invited him along. His name is Alex Jones. Alex Jones is one of the nuts similar to Randy Weaver and he hosts a radio show. He accepted the invitation. While planning the infiltration, Ronson learned of this lawyer, Rick, who'd snuck in several times before. Ronson contacted him and got his help. Rick's instructions were simple, just walk in and act like you belong. That's what Rick and Ronson did. Alex Jones on the other hand decided to sneak in with one of his buddies a little differently. All saw the same ritual, but they came away with different interpretations. Jones provided the typical nutcase explanations, while Ronson described a strange ceremony as nothing more than a Fraternity party for geezers.
What's most interesting about Bohemian Grove is not what takes place, it's how people view it. There's a population out there that see it as a satanic ceremony for world domination. The thing is it's not. There was a time when it was the most powerful people in the world and maybe a lot of influence came out of the meetings. Now the attendees are mostly older and the younger folks are avoiding these kinds of gatherings, because they see them as lame. So, at some point the amount of power wielded by the Bohemian Grove crowd will rhyme with zero.
The book is great and well written. I had a difficult time putting it down. I don't know why some people have such screwed up perceptions of the world. Some of it must be due to their upbringing. It's not unusual that children will see the world with a similar lens as their parents. They may or may not come through life with the same ideals, but the parents will have a significant impact on that world view. In the case of the extremists, they tend to live in tight communities and so getting contrary information is difficult. They're like a weird genetic mutation or something. Read the book and check out the clips below. Part of the book was filmed for a documentary, Ronson's other job. Alex Jones interpretation of the Bohemian Grove ritual is further down.
31.12.09
14.12.09
Bad Astronomy
Bad Astronomy is kind of a catch-all book for astronomical misconceptions and myths. Philip Plait, the author, sets out to set the record straight a number of issues regarding astronomy. While Plait is a scientist, a man with a PhD, he doesn't write like one. The writing carries the Bill Nye enthusiasm with the college professor knowledge. Plait was, at the time of the book, a professor at Sonoma College.
Bad Astronomy covers a wide range of topics from egg balancing to the moon hoax and several other things in between. As mentioned above, the book does not drip with geek-speak. It's a very down to earth, nearly conversational in nature. I especially like that I could share fact from the book fairly easily. What's the point of reading a book if you can't enlighten those around you.
It all started with chapter one and the myth of balaning eggs only at the Spring equinox. Apparently there's a myth, on I was unaware of, that eggs can only balance at this time of the year. There's supposed to be some gravitational effect. So, often school kids get roped into testing this theory. Of course somebody succeeds, thus perpetuating the myth. The problem is, there's nothing special about the time of year. Given the right patience a steady hand, and the right egg, you too can balance an egg...any time of the year. My wife, brother, sister and I put this to the test over the Thanksgiving holiday. It worked of course. We just had to use the right egg.
Plait goes into a few other misconceptions, most notably the rotation of draining water and the color of the sun. When you ask somebody if they know anything interesting about drains, they'll most likely refer to the Coriolis Effect. The main point here being that drains swirl the opposite way depending on which hemishpere your in (Counter-clockwise up north and Clockwise down south). The Coriolis Effect is too weak and sinks/toilets/bathtubs too small for the Coriolis Effect to have any noticable impact. It should be noted that there is potential impact, but very small. In fact you would likely need to let the water sit for a week* or so then drain the container one drop at a time. When in comes to toilets, the water swirls solely because of the jets in an effort to keep that porcelien shine from becoming too marred, if you know what I mean.
What color is the sky? Blue of course. But why? Well it's not really blue and in fact a lot of people know that. They'll even get the answer partially correct and refer to the pollutants in the air refracting the light. They are correct that it's something in the air, but it's not the pollutants, it's the air itself. When the photons enter the atmoshere, much of the color gets delfected by the molecules in the air. The Reds and Oranges are affected the most. The Violets and Indigoes are affecte the least. The Blues have just the right wavelength that they scatter everywhere, but still make it your eye. They make it to your eye from every direction under the sun which causes the sky to appear blue. So, then what color is the sun? It's white. Most people assume is yellow, because the only time they can look at it is at sunset when it appears yellow. If it were possible to look at the sun directly during the day, it would be white.
Then there's the moon hoax theory. I admit that I dabbled into that territory in the past. I never became one of THEM though. Plait deals with this subject quite well and shares solid evidence and explanation for the veracity of the moon landing. A favorite of the moon hoax nuts is the lack of stars in the still pictures. This is easily explained by the fact that the shutter speed on the camera was short due to the amount of sunlight and the light from the stars was not strong enough to show up in the pictures. Another issue centers around the flapping of the flag, like it's being blown in the wind. What they forget is that without the atmoshpere the flag is more likely to flap because the lack of wind resistence. Any movment affecting the flag would be more exagerated.
While I never became a believer of the moon hoax, I studied in seriously enough to give it fair consideration. In the end, the offcial and sceintific explanations won out for me. They made more sense to start with. The key was their simplicity. Believing in a staged moon landing took more imagination and more effort. How was this pulled off without a single insider blowing the lid? Why did Russia not challenge the veracity of the event if the hoax is so obvious, as the believers claim? On the technical side, the effort to make it look real seems it would cost as much, if not more, to pull it off. Several years ago I saw some footage from the moon landing that settled things permanently (though my conclusion was already pretty secure). The footage was of the moon rover driving around the moon and I noticed two important things. First, I could see stars in the picture. They were faint, but I could see them (only a few at that). That's the benefit of a moving picture I suppose. The other thing I noticed was a perfect rainbow of moon dust kicked up by the tires. There was not a speck of dust floating in the air, just as if they were driving in a perfect vacuum. Not something that's easily created here on Earth.
That's the long and short of Bad Astronomy. It's a worthwhile read, especially with somebody who has a budding interest in astronomy. I think it's a good read for anybody, just to become familiar with astronomical phenomena. It's best to educate yourself so you don't fall victim to stupid ideas like the moon hoax. Below is footage from Mythbusters with their testing of moon hoax claims.
* I've seen estimates range from 2 hours to 3 weeks. I figure a week is a good middle ground.
Bad Astronomy covers a wide range of topics from egg balancing to the moon hoax and several other things in between. As mentioned above, the book does not drip with geek-speak. It's a very down to earth, nearly conversational in nature. I especially like that I could share fact from the book fairly easily. What's the point of reading a book if you can't enlighten those around you.
It all started with chapter one and the myth of balaning eggs only at the Spring equinox. Apparently there's a myth, on I was unaware of, that eggs can only balance at this time of the year. There's supposed to be some gravitational effect. So, often school kids get roped into testing this theory. Of course somebody succeeds, thus perpetuating the myth. The problem is, there's nothing special about the time of year. Given the right patience a steady hand, and the right egg, you too can balance an egg...any time of the year. My wife, brother, sister and I put this to the test over the Thanksgiving holiday. It worked of course. We just had to use the right egg.
Plait goes into a few other misconceptions, most notably the rotation of draining water and the color of the sun. When you ask somebody if they know anything interesting about drains, they'll most likely refer to the Coriolis Effect. The main point here being that drains swirl the opposite way depending on which hemishpere your in (Counter-clockwise up north and Clockwise down south). The Coriolis Effect is too weak and sinks/toilets/bathtubs too small for the Coriolis Effect to have any noticable impact. It should be noted that there is potential impact, but very small. In fact you would likely need to let the water sit for a week* or so then drain the container one drop at a time. When in comes to toilets, the water swirls solely because of the jets in an effort to keep that porcelien shine from becoming too marred, if you know what I mean.
What color is the sky? Blue of course. But why? Well it's not really blue and in fact a lot of people know that. They'll even get the answer partially correct and refer to the pollutants in the air refracting the light. They are correct that it's something in the air, but it's not the pollutants, it's the air itself. When the photons enter the atmoshere, much of the color gets delfected by the molecules in the air. The Reds and Oranges are affected the most. The Violets and Indigoes are affecte the least. The Blues have just the right wavelength that they scatter everywhere, but still make it your eye. They make it to your eye from every direction under the sun which causes the sky to appear blue. So, then what color is the sun? It's white. Most people assume is yellow, because the only time they can look at it is at sunset when it appears yellow. If it were possible to look at the sun directly during the day, it would be white.
Then there's the moon hoax theory. I admit that I dabbled into that territory in the past. I never became one of THEM though. Plait deals with this subject quite well and shares solid evidence and explanation for the veracity of the moon landing. A favorite of the moon hoax nuts is the lack of stars in the still pictures. This is easily explained by the fact that the shutter speed on the camera was short due to the amount of sunlight and the light from the stars was not strong enough to show up in the pictures. Another issue centers around the flapping of the flag, like it's being blown in the wind. What they forget is that without the atmoshpere the flag is more likely to flap because the lack of wind resistence. Any movment affecting the flag would be more exagerated.
While I never became a believer of the moon hoax, I studied in seriously enough to give it fair consideration. In the end, the offcial and sceintific explanations won out for me. They made more sense to start with. The key was their simplicity. Believing in a staged moon landing took more imagination and more effort. How was this pulled off without a single insider blowing the lid? Why did Russia not challenge the veracity of the event if the hoax is so obvious, as the believers claim? On the technical side, the effort to make it look real seems it would cost as much, if not more, to pull it off. Several years ago I saw some footage from the moon landing that settled things permanently (though my conclusion was already pretty secure). The footage was of the moon rover driving around the moon and I noticed two important things. First, I could see stars in the picture. They were faint, but I could see them (only a few at that). That's the benefit of a moving picture I suppose. The other thing I noticed was a perfect rainbow of moon dust kicked up by the tires. There was not a speck of dust floating in the air, just as if they were driving in a perfect vacuum. Not something that's easily created here on Earth.
That's the long and short of Bad Astronomy. It's a worthwhile read, especially with somebody who has a budding interest in astronomy. I think it's a good read for anybody, just to become familiar with astronomical phenomena. It's best to educate yourself so you don't fall victim to stupid ideas like the moon hoax. Below is footage from Mythbusters with their testing of moon hoax claims.
* I've seen estimates range from 2 hours to 3 weeks. I figure a week is a good middle ground.
I.O.U.S.A. - 2
Ok, so we're not totally screwed. Things are not looking good, at least according to this book. The national debt is growing like Tiger Wood's list of 'lovers' and programs such and Medicare and Social Security are poised to squeeze out other programs as they begin to require more funding. I.O.U.S.A is not just a book though, it's also a movie. In fact it was a movie before it was a book. The book seeks to summarize the film, in less than 100 pages. In addition to the summary, the book includes interviews with many of the subject of the film. These folks come from all ends of the spectrum of politics. Most, but not all, see the mounting debt as 'the' issue of our time.
The emotion in the film makes it a far more effective communicator than the book. When David Walker, former Comptroller General, speaks he has a passion about the state of things. That's largely missing from the book. Granted, it's hard to capture that kind of thing in the written word, unless you're a great fiction writer. The advantage of the book is the fact that you can reference it and show people key points, hi-lite and take notes.
The best interviews, in my opinion come from David Walker (it's worth youtube-ing the guy as well), Ron Paul, Arthur Laffer, Paul Volcker and Paul O'Neil. This section is good just because you get more information from these folks than could be found in the film.
What I find interesting based on reading the book is potential dire situation we may be heading toward. In the next 30-40 years, the government will have severe difficulty meeting its obligations. The issues are Social Security and Medicare. Meeting them will be near impossible according to current trends, and that's if you eliminate every other federal service; thus the US government becomes a health care/retirement program. The likelihood of this actually happening is quite low. It just means that things will have to change so the balance sheets don't get all out of whack. That means either a cut in benefits, increase in taxes, reduction in other programs, or a combination of all three. What concerns me, after reading this book is the push toward public health-care, a la France.
I'm not against a way to provide health-care to those who struggle. I do think it has to be reasonable. Even if Obama states that the public option would be covered without needing additional tax funds. That may be true now, it may not be true in the future. I believe that when Social Security and Medicare were rolled out, they weren't expected to bring such a perceived burden looming over our heads or our children's heads. Reason had an interesting take on health-care. I know that this situation won't be the same for the 40 million uninsured, but it fits some:
It distresses me that when John Mackey expresses his point of view on health-care he gets crucified, virtually. If we're concerned about finding solutions to these problems, then we should be willing to look into as many realistic options as possible and find the best. I don't like the knee-jerk reaction that we need to turn to the government to solve our problems. There have to be creative ways to solve some of them ourselves. Imagine in auto insurance functioned like health insurance. Filling up with gas or getting an oil change would include a copay, not the actual price of the service. Imagine if each fill up were just $10 or $20. You think pollution is bad now? Granted that's an analogy that may not fit perfectly, but it's the kind of thinking that needs to be looked at. That said, here are some of Mackey's comments from Reason:
Back to the book. In short, I get the message that we need to be more conscious about what we expect from the government. Even when they try to do the right thing, they often get it wrong. It spans from programs to feel good laws, like these at Cracked.com. We're in this mess because people wanted to do the right thing and help others out. Maybe sometimes that's not really the right thing. Providing health care and social security may in the end not be in the country's best interest, over the long run. In a statement from Alexis de Tocqueville in his Memoir on Pauperism he said "It is necessary to do what is most useful for the receiver, not what pleases the giver".
In the end. the book was not near as inspiring as the film, but it's worth checking out, from the library (assuming you can't access the movie). A 30 minute cut of the movie can be found here. For some reason they had the embedding capability disabled.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)